![]() |
| #1 | |
| Administrator Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 2,952 ![]() | There has been a new article posted. Title: StarTech.com WattSmart 650 W Power Supply Review URL: http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/528 Here is a snippet: "This 650 W power supply from StarTech.com looks like a very high-end unit, as it is bigger than traditional power supplies and uses a dual-transformer design, feature we've only seen on power supplies..." Comments on this article are welcome. Best regards, Hardware Secrets Team http://www.hardwaresecrets.com |
| | |
This advertisement is only shown to unregistered users. Register today and stop seeing this ad. |
| #2 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2 ![]() | Gabriel, please stop repeating the ridiculous assertion that separate secondaries are better. The lowest-ripple way to build a power supply is polyphase, like all motherboard processor supplies are doing. You have separate primary switches, which operate out of phase, and you join the secondaries. Voltage ripple comes from the current ripple in the output inductors meeting the secondary output capacitors. While the primary is switched on, the secondary output current ramps up. While the primary is off, it ramps down. Now, imagine two such sawtooth waveforms of equal size and 50% duty cycle but opposite phase. Their sum is: zero current ripple! Which means zero voltage ripple. Now, you never achieve exactly 50% duty cycle, but the combination still greatly reduces the output ripple. It also helps your input ripple, which is a pleasant side effect. Now, using just one set of primary switching transistors and operating the transformers in phase is just the same as using a single bigger transformer. Whether you join the outputs together or not has no effect on the output ripple. Which is a shame. You certainly do not get better regulation from separate secondaries; you get worse. As long as you have only one set of primary switches, only one secondary output gets to control the switching duty cycle. The other outputs follow along as best they can, but aren't in the main regulation feedback loop. |
| | |
| #3 | |
| Administrator Join Date: Oct 2004 USA Posts: 2,553 ![]() | Hi, First thank you for this great message. I am always opened to learn more. What you explain makes a lot of sense and I shall correct this in the future and use this information when I update our Anatomy of Power Supplies tutorial. Cheers, Gabriel. |
| | |
| #4 | ||
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 7 ![]() | Quote:
Lower noise/ripple is good for capacitor life span, but how much? 4years/10months/6days instead of 4years/10months/12days? Seems to me that commenting noise/ripple is the new "thing" among the hardware review sites, maybe because they feel they do better reviews compared to those sites that don't use a scope. I'm not saying there is no need to measure noise/ripple, but I would like to see more soberness when commenting the results. What I really would like to see is how well PSUs regulate in the voltage after being subjected to fast load changes, and the use of a thermal imaging cameras to reveal hot-spots inside the PSU. | |
| | |
| #5 | |||||
| Administrator Join Date: Oct 2004 USA Posts: 2,553 ![]() | Hello and thanks for your comments. Please read the full explanation here: http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/181 Quote:
http://www.badcaps.net I also recommend you to take a look on this review: http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/534 Quote:
Quote:
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/410 From then on reader became more exigent and other websites started to try to do something different. Since most of them don't have enough revenues to support investing on a power supply load tester (which costs around USD 3,000) several invested in a PC-based oscilloscope (which costs less than USD 300). It is my opinion that the ripple results alone don't tell you the whole story and that is why that I continue to say that reviews that don't do load tests are wrong. Ripple is just one of the aspects one should observe. Quote:
Cheers, Gabriel. | ||||
| | |
| #6 | |||
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 7 ![]() | Question is, what is too high? I don't think hardware review sites have the knowledge to tell. Sorry for being so blunt ![]() Quote:
More here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor_plague Flawed electrolyte formulas, or flawed design, isn't good enough reason to set aside the ATX spec. Quote:
Electrolyte capacitors has evolved the last decades. Todays capacitors are better now than they were 15 years ago. If noise/ripple requirements were OK then they are most likely OK now. If not I'm sure Intel and the other chip manufactures would have called for better specs. | ||
| | |
| #7 | ||||
| Administrator Join Date: Oct 2004 USA Posts: 2,553 ![]() | Quote:
Here we want to see if the power supply is within ATX spec or not, and we usually grade a power supply as a good unit if noise is 50% lower or less than what set by ATX spec. Quote:
Quote:
Cheers, Gabriel. | |||
| | |
| #8 | |
| Administrator Join Date: Oct 2004 USA Posts: 2,553 ![]() | By the way. I just remembered about this interesting review posted at Jonny GURU that shows exactly what happens with capacitors and ripple/noise after some years: http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php...=Story&reid=71 I hope this helps everybody interested in learning more about ripple and noise. Cheers, Gabriel. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |